Skip to main content

Texas Society of Eye Physicians and Surgeons (formerly Texas Ophthalmological Association)

Lobbying groupUS-TXverified

Identifiers

website
https://www.texaseyes.org/
org kind
professional_association

What this organization says it wants

Texas Society of Eye Physicians and Surgeons (formerly Texas Ophthalmological Association) is on record about 4 bills, through federal lobbying filings and testimony to state committees. None of them carries both a stated side and a bill we have placed on the scale, so there is nothing here to compare yet.

Reading your profile on this device…

The positions, and the documents they come from

Every position below links to the record it was read from. We do not store one without a link — a claim you cannot check is the thing this list exists to prevent.

  • ForTX-89-hb3749Relating to the regulation of the provision of elective intravenous therapy.

    “FOR: Texas society of eye physicians and surgeons”

    Testimony to a Texas committee2025Open the recordnot counted yet

  • AgainstTX-89-hb4099Relating to the treatment of a patient by a physical therapist without a referral.

    “AGAINST: Texas Society of Eye Physicians and Surgeons”

    Testimony to a Texas committee2025Open the recordnot counted yet

  • ForTX-89-hb4539Relating to the dispensing of certain drugs by physicians specializing in ophthalmology.

    “FOR: Self; Texas society of eye physicians and Surgeons”

    Testimony to a Texas committee2025Open the recordnot counted yet

  • ForTX-89-sb815Relating to the use of certain automated systems in, and certain adverse determinations made in connection with, the health benefit claims process.

    “FOR: Self; Texas Ophthalmological Association”

    Testimony to a Texas committee2025Open the recordnot counted yet

Marked positions are on record but not yet counted: we have not placed those bills on our scale, so they do not move any number on this page.

What it says on the issues

Statements that name no bill. Each was placed on one of our lines by reading the quote, and kept only where our quiz questions on that line, answered from the same quote, lean the same way. Each counts like one answer to a quiz question.

  • Institutional trust ↔ Institutional distrust (v7 #46/#47 carried over)defer to expert and professional institutions

    “TSEPS will not sit idly by while a small, radical faction of non-physicians seeks authority to treat patients with surgical and medical modalities in which they are not trained and which require a comprehensive medical education to fully manage.”

    Published by the organisationOpen the record

2 more readings were held back because the quiz questions on that line did not agree with them, or could not be answered from the quote.

What we don't have on this organization

  • No politicians linked

    We have no contribution from this organization to any candidate on file yet. The contribution walk is still running, so this may be a gap in our ingestion rather than in its giving.

  • No committee totals

    This committee’s own receipts and disbursements — its totals as filed — are not ingested. What we hold about its money is the contributions we have matched to named candidates.